PDA

View Full Version : I am everything


Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 1:25pm
that I experience.:facelol:

River
Wed Oct 21 2009, 1:31pm
I am everything that I perceive, and I want to perceive from the highest frequency, essence of love, and from there. I am not my thoughts. I am all that is, consciousness, and nothing. I am undefinable and want to know myself closest to that. I am beyond my roles and jobs, gender and physical body. I am vibration, energy and interconnected with all that is.

:heart:shannon

Welcome Jobo Pooks and thanks for your perspectives.

Nightprincessa
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:06pm
I am all that is. No exclutions! :p

Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:26pm
I am all that is. No exclutions! :p

Do you experience all that is?

Nightprincessa
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:35pm
Yes, I experience all that is me. If there is anything more, I am not aware of it, thus, it doesn't exist (to me.)

I am all that is contained within my Consciousness, otherwise I wouldn't be able to be conscious of it. :)

Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:38pm
Yes, I experience all that is me. If there is anything more, I am not aware of it, thus, it doesn't exist (to me.)

I am all that is contained within my Consciousness, otherwise I wouldn't be able to be conscious of it. :)

What are the exclusions you speak of ?
:grin:

Rodney
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:41pm
When you say "I am", you focus into a perspective that is only a slice of all-that-is. And so, if you ever think in terms of I, then you are already only a slice of the whole.

Nightprincessa
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:42pm
I just wanted to make a statement that there is nothing in my Consciousness that I am not. So I only used the word for emphasis. :)

If there are no exclutions, then there are none! ;)

Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:46pm
I just wanted to make a statement that there is nothing in my Consciousness that I am not. So I only used the word for emphasis. :)

If there are no exclutions, then there are none! ;)

So what you are saying is that there is nothing in your experience that is not ?:facelol:

Rodney
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:47pm
So what you are saying is that there is something in your experience that is? :facelol:

Corrected.

Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:47pm
When you say "I am", you focus into a perspective that is only a slice of all-that-is. And so, if you ever think in terms of I, then you are already only a slice of the whole.

It depends on whether you think of yourself as a slice or whether you know that you as I is simply us as one.

Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:52pm
Corrected.

Originally Posted by Jobo Pooks http://abetalk.com/images/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://abetalk.com/showthread.php?p=73831#post73831)
So what you are saying is that there is something in your experience that is? :facelol:

Where did I say that?:facelol:

Harmen Last (Lonelyguide) did this quite a lot. He would put together bits and pieces of things that other people had said, in a random way of course (yeh right)and then quote them on it on forums. I loved his humour. Unfortunately, he got the sads with me just before he checked out and wouldn't be consoled. Andrew Wilcox didn't quite have the powerful control he claimed either. He was really funny also. People are really funny when they try to control from a place of non-control.

Nightprincessa
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:52pm
Semantics.

I can't find the right words to say it at the moment, or they probably don't exist in my reality. Either way, I know what I mean and it only matters to me. :namaste:

Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 2:56pm
Semantics.

I can't find the right words to say it at the moment, or they probably don't exist in my reality. Either way, I know what I mean and it only matters to me. :namaste:

Exactly.:facelol:

Nightprincessa
Wed Oct 21 2009, 3:09pm
Since you opened a thread, and opening a thread means you expect responses, then I simply participated by stating my perspective.

But I certainly don't have to, or need to, explain it. :facelol:

Jobo Pooks
Wed Oct 21 2009, 3:11pm
Since you opened a thread, and opening a thread means you expect responses, then I simply participated by stating my perspective.

But I certainly don't have to, or need to, explain it. :facelol:Of course not, if that's where you're coming from. Feel free.:facelol:

yeslist
Wed Oct 21 2009, 3:27pm
It's an all inclusive universe, although, there is this wonderful attribute we have, CHOICE.
I choose to follow my highest excitement and allow the rest to fall away.
Something only vibrates in my reality when I pay attention to it.
Everything(and non thing) is there, but not everything(or non thing) is vibing in alignment with me.
I am the sum total and the part simultaneously. I am an expression/ perspective of the whole harbouring the essence of all that is within.
Separation can only be defined from a physical perspective...and I have come to know that the physical realm is just a reflection of the sum of beingness, as a consciousness. A kind of illusion which carries mommentum. The physical is the afterglow of beingness. It is sustained by the continued excitement generated by focus. All those little thoughts get activated through the stimulation of focus. Thought is the conveyer of energy! When I focus I ride the thought I choose that makes me feel best. Just like riding a bus.
Si